Email this article 
A Comparative Analysis of Aerial Photo Data Processing Using Agisoft Metashape Professional and WEBODM
Abstract
This study compares the results of aerial photo data processing using Agisoft Metashape and WebODM software, focusing on geometric accuracy, orthomosaic quality, and processing time. The data consisted of 504 aerial photographs captured by a WingtraOne Gen II UAV and seven Independent Check Points (ICPs). Agisoft Metashape utilized photo alignment, dense cloud generation, DEM, and orthomosaic construction, while WebODM applied auto boundary, DEM, fast orthophoto, high PC quality, and skipped 3D model generation. The geometric accuracy was evaluated using CE90 and LE90 values, and the orthophoto quality was assessed through planimetric analysis. The results showed that WebODM completed the process in 19 hours and 57 minutes, whereas Agisoft required over 3 days. Agisoft yielded better accuracy (CE90 = 0.21 m, LE90 = 0.64 m) compared to WebODM (CE90 = 0.29 m, LE90 = 0.70 m). In terms of orthophoto quality, Agisoft preserved building and bridge shapes better than WebODM.
Keywords: Agisoft Metashape; WebODM; Geometric Accuracy
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustian, L. (2019). Pembuatan Peta Orthophoto Dan Dem Menggunakan Dua Software Pengolahan Foto Udara Dari Data Hasil Pemotretan Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Reka Geomatika: Jurnal Institut Teknologi Nasional. Https://Www.Scribd.Com/Document/432723106/232015002-Lendra-Agustian-Perbandingan-Software-Pix4d-Dengan-Agisoft
Agustina, F. D. (2021a). Evaluasi Uji Perbandingan Ketelitian Pada Orthophoto Berdasarkan Standar Asprs. Elipsoida, Vol 4 No 1, 16–26. Https://Ejournal2.Undip.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Elipsoida/Article/Download/11015/6300
Agustina, F. D. (2021b). Evaluasi Uji Perbandingan Ketelitian Pada Ortofoto Berdasarkan Standar Asprs. Elipsoida : Jurnal Geodesi Dan Geomatika, 4(01), 16–26. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Elipsoida.2021.11015
Alnando, N., Tjahjadi, M. E., & Suhari, K. T. (2022). Komparasi Model 3d Jembatan Dari Pemotretan Konvergen Dan Normal Menggunakan Drone. Jambura Geoscience Review, Vol. 4, No 2, 123–135. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.34312/Jgeosrev.V4i2.13437
Ardiansyah, Suryalfihra, S. I., Arifin, D., & Prasetya, F. V. A. S. (2023). Perbandingan Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Agisoft Metashape Professional Dan Apsmenci. Journal Of Geomatics Engineering, Technology, And Sciences (Jgets), 01, 42–49. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.51967/Gets.V1i2.20
Burdziakowski, P. (2017). Evaluation Of Open Drone Map Toolkit For Geodetic Grade Aerial Drone Mapping – Case Study. 17 International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference Sgem 2017 :Informatics, Geoinformatics And Remote Sensing, 23, Article 23. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.5593/Sgem2017/23/S10.013
Diodemus, P., Wahyono, E. B., & Sufyandi, Y. (2020). Analisis Pemanfaatan Foto Udara Hasil Pemotretan Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Uav) Tipe Post-Processed Kinematic (Ppk) Untuk Pemetaan Topografi. Seminar Nasional Geomatika 2020: Informasi Geospasial Untuk Inovasi Percepatan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan, 886. Https://Doi.Org/10.24895/Sng.2020.0-0.1204
Gkontzis, A. F., Kotsiantis, S., Feretzakis, G., & Verykios, V. S. (2024). Enhancing Urban Resilience: Smart City Data Analyses, Forecasts, And Digital Twin Techniques At The Neighborhood Level. Future Internet, 16(2), 47. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Fi16020047
H, E., & Rostami, S. G. (2022). Analysis And Comparison Of The Exactness Of Specialist Drone-Based Software Products In Urban And Exurban Region. Scientific- Research Quarterly Of Geographical Data (Sepehr), 31(123), 63–87. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.22131/Sepehr.2022.699908
Hamur, P. K., Tjahjadi, E., & Yuliananda, A. (2019). Kajian Pengolahan Data Foto Udara Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Agisoft Photoscan Dan Pix4d Mapper (Studi Kasus: Kecamatan Lowokwaru, Kota Malang). Jurnal Itn Malang, 5. Https://Eprints.Itn.Ac.Id/3961/
Hapriansyah, S. A., & Hidayat, H. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Ketelitian Hasil Orthomosaic Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Komersial Pix4dmapper Dan Open Source Webodm Drone. Jurnal Teknik Its, 10, A345. Https://Pdfs.Semanticscholar.Org/0e04/Ed1269eb56ae7700d444dfcd451ff6f9c6cf.Pdf?_Gl=1*Jrf7ay*_Ga*Mtczmji2mzcylje2otk1mtexnjg.*_Ga_H7p4zt52h5*Mtcxndc0ntg1nc4yljeumtcxndc0ntg4ni4yoc4wlja.
Hapriansyah, S. A., & Hidayat, H. (2022). Analisis Pembuatan Peta Orthomosaic Menggunakan Perangkat Lunak Open Source Webodm. Journal Of Geodesy And Geomatics, 1, 136–144. Https://Doi.Org/Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.12962/J24423998.V18i1.10479
Hartono, D., & Darmawan, S. (2018). Pemanfaatan Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Uav) Jenis Quadcopter Untuk Percepatan Pemetaan Bidang Tanah (Studi Kasus: Desa Solokan Jeruk Kabupaten Bandung). Reka Geomatika: Jurnal Institut Teknologi Nasional, Hlm. 31. Https://Eprints.Itenas.Ac.Id/1983/1/Soni Darmawan - 12.Pdf
Ipate, G., Tudora, C., & Illie, F. (2024). Digital Analysis With The Help Of An Integrated Uav System For The Surveillance Of Fruit And Wine Areas. Agriculture, 14(11). Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.3390/Agriculture14111930
Jepril, Melo, R. H., Pambudi, M. R., & Asrul. (2025). Kajian Geospasial Untuk Pengembangan Fasilitas Pendukung Destinasi Wisata Di Gorontalo: Literatur Review. Jurnal Riset Dan Pengabdian Interdisipliner, Vol. 2, No, 362–368. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.37905/Jrpi.V2i2.31498
Patel, S., Chintanadilok, J., Hall-Scharf, B., Zhuang, Y., Strickland, J., & Singh, A. (2024). Webodm: An Open-Source Alternative To Commercial Image Stitching Software For Uncrewed Aerial Systems. Uf/Ifas University Of Florida. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.32473/Edis-Ae593-2024
Peraturan Badan Informasi Geospasial Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Kepala Badan Informasi Geospasial Nomor 15 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Teknis Ketelitian Peta Dasar, Pub. L. No. Perka Big No. 6 Tahun 2018 (2018). Https://Jdihn.Go.Id/Files/217/27330968
Putra, W. B., Faisal, G., Dewi, N. I. K., & Firzal, Y. (2023). Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Uav) Photogrammetry For Heritage Building Documentation: Case Study Sasaksaat Train Station, Bandung, Indonesia. International Journal Of Environment, Architecture, And Societies, 3(02), 72–86. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.26418/Ijeas.2023.3.02.72-86
Rachmanto, D. H., & Ihsan, M. (2020). Pemanfaatan Metode Fotogrametri Untuk Pemetaan Skala 1 : 1000 (Studi Kasus : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). Jurnal Enmap (Environment & Mapping), 1.
Sanjaya, T. S. S., Handayani, W., & Widartono, B. S. (2018). Perbandingan Software Agisoft Photoscan, Pix4d, Dan Aps Menci Untuk Pemrosesan Data Foto Udara Menjadi Orthophoto Dan Digital Surface Model. Universitas Gadjah Mada. Https://Etd.Repository.Ugm.Ac.Id/Penelitian/Detail/165384
Tjiong, Dinoto, S., Prasetyo, Y., & Bashit, N. (2021). Analisis Pemodelan 3 Dimensi Pada Metode Close Range Photogrammetry Menggunakan Free And Open Source Software. Jurnal Geodesi Undip, Volume [10, 216–223. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.14710/Jgundip.2021.29705
Vacca, G. (2020). Web Open Drone Map (Webodm) A Software Open Source To Photogrammetry Process. Fig Working Week 2020. Smart Surveyors For Land And Water Management. Https://Iris.Unica.It/Handle/11584/300743#
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
INDEX JOURNAL
